• Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Laura Ingalls Wilder
    • The Ingalls Family
    • The Historic Sites
    • The Books
    • The TV Show
    • The Mini-Series
    • The Musical
    • The Documentary
  • Lifestyle
    • Recipes
    • Crafting
    • Gardening
    • Family Fun
  • Learning
    • History
    • Recommended Reading
    • School House
  • Community
    • Share Your Story
    • Your Stories
    • Inspirations
    • Meet Our Contributors
  • Events
  • Store
  • Search

Little House on the Prairie

Navigation
  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Laura Ingalls Wilder
    • The Ingalls Family
    • The Historic Sites
    • The Books
    • The TV Show
    • The Mini-Series
    • The Musical
    • The Documentary
  • Lifestyle
    • Recipes
    • Crafting
    • Gardening
    • Family Fun
  • Learning
    • History
    • Recommended Reading
    • School House
  • Community
    • Share Your Story
    • Your Stories
    • Inspirations
    • Meet Our Contributors
  • Events
  • Store
  • Search

Historical Perspective or Racism in Little House on the Prairie?

December 7, 2018 By Laura McLemore
This may contain affiliate links and we may receive a small commission on purchases.

Historical Perspective or Racism in Little House on the Prairie

Imagine you are reading a book that you loved as a child, perhaps you are reading it to your young child, or that you are reading it for the very first time. You come across the words “the only good Indian was a dead Indian.” Do you put the book down in horror, shocked by the cultural insensitivity of the author? Do you decry the author as a racist and vow to never read another word?  What would you say if you knew that these words are found in the beloved book Little House on the Prairie by Laura Ingalls Wilder?

Historical Perspective or Racism in Little House on the Prairie?

In recent years the Little House books by Laura Ingalls Wilder have been accused of being culturally insensitive and even racist, particularly Little House on the Prairie. In an article with the jarring title “Little Squatter on the Osage Diminished Reserve”, Francis Kaye states “Wilder, writing as honestly as she knew how, spun a tale that, because of her very decency, makes ‘ethnic cleansing’ appear palatable.”

As Amy Fatzinger writes in her dissertation Indians in the House, Wilder raises “a great issue that was still problematic in the 1930s, when Little House on the Prairie was written and remains so today: the Euro-American preemption of lands occupied by Native Americans.” And, Wilder uses the voice of 7-year-old Laura to do so.

The questions then arise, is this because Wilder is culturally insensitive or is she simply writing from her perspective, having been born in 1867 and writing in the 1930s?

Teachable Moments

Historical Perspective or Racism in Little House on the Prairie

Fifth graders from Cleaveland Traditional Magnet Elementary School in Wichita, Kansas reading Little House on the Prairie.

Reading Little House on the Prairie with children today requires explanation. I call them teachable moments. Before we begin to read the book in my classroom I take a few moments to talk about Wilder’s real life and the historical accuracy of her books. There is the truth as Laura wrote in her books and there is the truth of her real life. After all, Laura was only two when her family left Wisconsin and barely three when they arrived on the prairie. Obviously, she was cast as older than that in both Little House in the Big Woods and Little House on the Prairie. Laura’s stories come from an oral tradition. Her father was a storyteller and Laura herself said that her first books were an attempt to preserve the stories she grew up hearing.

That is not to say that Wilder didn’t do her research as she wrote her books. But, we must remember, this was before the Internet. Wilder lived in rural Missouri, far away from libraries or universities with large reference sections. She did not have information at her fingertips. Laura had to rely on letter writing or long, slow trips to do on-site research as she did for Little House on the Prairie. As a result, some of her writing isn’t accurate. And of course, she was writing historical fiction, not an autobiography. But, to understand Laura’s story, we must understand the history behind the story.

The history behind Little House on the Prairie

Historical Perspective or Racism in Little House on the Prairie

Map of the Osage Diminished Reserve

What do readers need to know when reading Little House on the Prairie? I am not going to attempt to give a complete history of the Osage people or the sad legacy of the systematic removal of Native Americans by the government of the United States. Here’s some information that will put things in perspective as you read.

Little House on the Prairie begins with the Ingalls family leaving their little house in Wisconsin. Laura says “They drove away and left it lonely and empty in the clearing…They were going to Indian country.” But, they didn’t go there directly. Charles Ingalls sold his farm in Wisconsin in 1868. He moved his family first to Chariton County, Missouri and then on to Montgomery County, Kansas in late 1868 or early 1869. They were part of an illegal rush of settlers into the Osage Diminished Reserve commonly called Indian Territory. Few people today realize, and perhaps Laura herself didn’t know, that a section of Kansas was once called Indian Territory.

We usually think of Oklahoma as being Indian Territory. However, beginning in 1808, the Osage tribe ceded several tracts of land to the United States government. The Treaty of 1825 established the Osage Diminished Reserve, a section of land about 50 miles wide and 125 miles long in what is now south-central and southeast Kansas. In 1868, the Osage were facing dire economic circumstances. The government had not paid them what was owed due to the great debt incurred by the Civil War and hunting was becoming scarce due to the settlement of the western frontier. The Osage were forced once again to negotiate with the United States and signed the Sturgis Treaty. This treaty said that the Osage would sell their land to the Leavenworth, Lawrence, and Galveston Railroad and buy land from the Cherokee further south and move there.

Squatters on Indian Land

Historical Perspective or Racism in Little House on the Prairie

Osage men in traditional dress

News of the impending opening of Indian Territory reached land-hungry settlers back east and caused an illegal land rush into the area. Congress refused to ratify the Sturgis Treaty, fearing a backlash from their constituents who favored free settlement of the land under the Homestead Act of 1862. The Ingalls family was part of the wave of squatters or illegal settlers who entered and established homes in Montgomery County. Whether Pa knew this or not is open for debate, but it is highly unlikely that he would have been ignorant of this fact. In Little House on the Prairie Ma tells Laura that “Pa had word from a man in Washington that the Indian Territory would be open to a settlement soon. It might already be open to settlement. They could not know because Washington was so far away.” Pa was most likely betting that the government would allow squatters to claim homesteads once the Osage were removed.

When most of the settlers arrived in Indian Territory, the Osage people were off on their annual hunting trips further west and it may have appeared that the land was unoccupied. Although the land that Pa chose was obviously next to a well-used trail, he preferred to think of the land as unsettled. In the early pages of Little House on the Prairie, Laura quotes Pa as saying that animals wandered “in a pasture that stretched much farther than a man could see, and there were no settlers. Only Indians lived there.” As did all of the settlers, Pa chose to ignore the fact that the land and everything on it belonged to the Osage people. He freely cut logs to build a house, hunted wild game for food and furs, dug a well and broke the land for farming. When the Osage returned from their trip they found their home and their lands occupied by all kinds of settlers who, in their minds, were stealing from them.

Ma’s fear and the “Minnesota Massacre”

Historical Perspective or Racism in Little House on the Prairie

Osage woman and man

Under the provisions of earlier treaties, the Osage had the right to charge squatters rent if they wanted to. Laura tells several stories of Indians coming to the Ingalls’ home and demanding food and other goods. They sometimes just came and took whatever they wanted. The Osage saw it as collecting rent. Ma saw it as an intrusion by uninvited guests. Ma was terrified of these visits. Wilder says that Jack, the Ingalls’ bulldog, hated the Indians and Ma said she didn’t blame him. Laura asks Ma, “Why don’t you like Indians, Ma…This is Indian country, isn’t it? What did we come to their country for, if you don’t like them?”; But why was Ma so afraid of the Osage? In order for readers to understand Ma, you need to understand where she was coming from.

Before moving to Kansas, the Ingalls lived near the border of Minnesota and Wisconsin. In late 1862 during the Civil War, many men left their families in Minnesota to fight in the war. Stretched to their limits, local militias were unable to protect their communities. The federal government denied any responsibility for protecting the settlers in Minnesota. The Indians in the area saw this as an opportunity to retake land that they felt belonged to them. The Sioux Uprising or Dakota Wars resulted in the looting and burning of homesteads and the killing of white settlers in the area, including women and children. The newspapers were full of graphic accounts of what was then referred to as the “Minnesota Massacre.” Undoubtedly Ma had read these accounts. Wilder mentions the “Minnesota Massacre” in her account of Mrs. Scott’s hatred for the Osage: “The only good Indian was a dead Indian. The very thought of Indians made her blood run cold. She said, ‘I can’t forget the Minnesota massacre. My Pa and brothers went out with the rest of the settlers…Ma made a sharp sound in her throat, and Mrs. Scott stopped. Whatever a massacre was, it was something that grown-ups would not talk about when little girls were listening.”

Helping children understand

Historical Perspective or Racism in Little House on the Prairie

Dr. Laura McLemore as Laura Ingalls Wilder. Laurapalooza 2012.

How can we help children develop an understanding of the historical perspective in Little House on the Prairie? I suggest we talk about whether Ma’s fears were justified. Ask if people have an unjustified fear of other races today. Does racism still exist and if so, is it found in every race? This past year my class talked about the riots in Ferguson, Missouri and the media’s portrayal of events there. Discuss how it would feel to have strangers walk into their home uninvited and take whatever they wanted. How would they tell the story to someone else? These kinds of questions will help children understand the historical perspective and that right or wrong, people have their own belief systems, then and now.

Additionally, it is helpful to point out that Wilder presents a more favorable point of view using Pa as a counterpoint. Pa is portrayed as being slightly more accepting of the Indians. For example, in chapter 21 of Little House on the Prairie, Pa must go to Independence to sell his furs. When Ma expresses concern about the Indians being so near, Pa comforts her by saying “They are perfectly friendly’…He often met Indians in the woods where he was hunting. There was nothing to fear from Indians.” Later Pa balances Mr. and Mrs. Scott’s hateful declaration when he makes this statement about Soldat du Chêne: “That’s one good Indian.’ No matter what Mr. Scott said, Pa did not believe that the only good Indian was a dead Indian.”

We may feel today, given our 21st-century sensitivity, that Ma was wrong to fear the Osage or that Mr. and Mrs. Scott were racist. And we are right, in our times they are. But I suggest that rather than banning books or refusing to read them, we use them as a platform for examining the history of the United States. What better way to learn our history than by reading a classic like Little House on the Prairie and using it as a platform for discussion?

Recommendations from the website editors

We recommend reading Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee: An Indian History of the American West by Dee Brown. The chapter about “Little Crow’s War” provides important context to the Dakota uprising in Minnesota. Other worthwhile books are Through Dakota Eyes: Narrative Accounts of the Minnesota Indian War of 1862 edited by Gary Clayton Anderson and Alan R. Woolworth and Over the Earth I Come: The Great Sioux Uprising of 1862 by Duane P. Schultz.

There have been many fascinating books written about Laura Ingalls Wilder and her daughter and editor Rose Wilder Lane. We invite you to visit our Recommended Reading section to find books for children and young adults and for adults. These books explore different areas of Wilder’s life and work, often bringing new and unexpected interpretations to a wide range of topics. They include classic titles and newer works.

You may also be interested in an entertaining and educational documentary film about Laura Ingalls Wilder, which is appropriate for all ages. The DVD contains an interesting bonus featurette about Native Americans and African Americans on the prairie.

The following two tabs change content below.
  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
Laura McLemore
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profile

Laura McLemore

An educator since 1983, Laura McLemore was destined to a lifelong love of Laura Ingalls Wilder. Her mother read Little House in the Big Woods in second grade and named her second daughter after the beloved author. McLemore portrayed Laura Ingalls Wilder for the first time in 1993. Since that time she has shared Wilder’s life across the Midwest. Laura lives in Maize, Kansas and is a fifth-grade teacher.
Laura McLemore
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profile

Latest posts by Laura McLemore (see all)

  • Historical Perspective or Racism in Little House on the Prairie? - December 7, 2018

Filed Under: History, Learning Tagged With: Books, History, Laura Ingalls Wilder, Little House on the Prairie

« Make Your Own Corn Cob Dolls DIY
Laura Ingalls Wilder Documentary »

Comments

  1. AvatarDee says

    August 23, 2016 at 3:04 pm

    Well- written! Proud of you my friend. I’m glad we share a love for the Ingalls.

    Reply
  2. AvatarCheryl Yasbec says

    August 23, 2016 at 4:34 pm

    Very interesting and excellent article.

    Reply
  3. Avatarglenda moats says

    August 23, 2016 at 8:49 pm

    I enjoyed it vry much. I am glad I wasn’t born in those days!

    Reply
  4. AvatarKaren Kimmi says

    August 23, 2016 at 9:30 pm

    When I was 8-9 in the ’70’s, my mom read the books to me, and I re-read them many times myself. I never thought her remarks about the Indians were “racist” as I was seeing them through the eyes of another naive 8 or 9 year old girl. I’m glad this is being used as a teaching resource to help kids understand cultural differences and conflicts and be more open minded. Great article!

    Reply
  5. AvatarBridget Bowman says

    August 23, 2016 at 9:46 pm

    Excellent read Laura!

    Reply
  6. AvatarElizabeth says

    August 23, 2016 at 9:56 pm

    Thank You! Finally, an article about the 1862 Sioux Uprising and how it relates to Little House! My ancestors are survivors who fled to New Ulm. I have their handwritten marriage certificate from 1860 in Brown County. Since I learned that story, I’ve understood Ma’s feelings better and why they make sense given the time in history. I’m not a writer so thanks for finally explaining it so simply.

    Reply
  7. AvatarJanet Greer says

    August 23, 2016 at 10:03 pm

    Laura, you never fail to amaze me. You use your remarkable, God-given talent for writing in such interesting ways. I’m privileged to call you my friend and fellow teacher.

    Reply
  8. AvatarNancy says

    August 23, 2016 at 10:10 pm

    I would strongly recommend that you get your hands on a copy of “Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee” by Dee Brown and read the chapter on “Little Crow’s War” for a better understanding of the Dakota uprising in Minnesota. It might beunderstandable for Caroline Ingalls, in her time and place, to call it the “Minnesota Massacre” but it is not appropriate to continue to use that term outside of a direct quote.

    Reply
    • AvatarAnn says

      August 7, 2018 at 11:18 pm

      I don’t care who you are or how mad you can be at someone but killing women and children and babies YES babies, makes it a massacre! It is appropriate to call it that because that’s what it was. All if it was cold blooded murder!

      Reply
  9. AvatarElizabeth Sherwood says

    August 23, 2016 at 10:30 pm

    Very interesting article! Excellent work!

    Reply
  10. AvatarAlicia says

    August 24, 2016 at 7:40 am

    Very well done. Written by a fine education.

    Reply
  11. Annette WhippleAnnette Whipple says

    August 30, 2016 at 2:23 pm

    Laura, this is a wonderful response to the racism in the books. I’m working on addressing this now.

    Reply
  12. AvatarRyan Howell says

    February 16, 2017 at 1:46 am

    Whoa now. There are two sides to the 1862 Dakota Conflict, the Dakota were starved by their Indian agents and were placed in a concentration camp for a year pending trial.

    “Minnesota Massacre” is about the most racist and blatant one-sided take on the 1862 Dakota Conflict you can find, its an old an sensationalized text that should not be taught to children.

    Try :Through Dakota Eyes: Narrative Accounts of the Minnesota Indian War of 1862 by Gary Clayton Anderson (Editor), Alan R. Woolworth (Editor)

    or “Over the Earth I Come: The Great Sioux Uprising of 1862” by Duane P. Schultz

    Reply
  13. AvatarMarinda says

    February 17, 2017 at 1:57 pm

    I when I was reading “Little House on the Prairie ” for the first time as a young girl about 22 years ago, I was concerned about Ma’s prejudices.
    I’m glad to see it addressed.

    Reply
  14. AvatarTodd Scribner says

    March 25, 2017 at 2:09 am

    Great article. I find it appalling that people fail to understand cultural relativism and how it may be used to better understand history and the interaction of cultures. In a relative sense, there are few heros and villains. Most act on the belief that they have the moral superiority. Referring to something by its known name is simply good communication. Re-naming an event does not give one side or the other greater legitimacy. From the perspective of the white settlers, I am sure it did seem like a massacre. From the perspective of the Indians, I’m sure it seemed like a righteous resistance.

    Reply
  15. AvatarClaire says

    May 15, 2017 at 1:11 pm

    I’m a long-time Little House fan from Australia. As an adult I have always read the books with a historical perspective and as being a product of their times.
    This article made me question why I had never questioned the reason the Ingalls Family settled on land that didn’t belong to them, even when I was a child and didn’t have a great knowledge of history. My conclusion is that Australia has its own entrenched history of displacing indigenous (Aboriginal) people that by the time I read the books when I was about 8 years old I just never questioned it. I already knew that was just what had happened. As an adult I find that really sad.
    I enjoyed this thought-provoking article and wanted to let you know that this particular teachable moment is applicable in other countries with a history of colonialism.

    Reply
  16. AvatarCarole says

    June 11, 2017 at 5:37 pm

    Interesting article. I first read the books when I was about 12 or so. I never read racism into the words, but I also knew, even at my young age, that times were different in Laura’s day. People need to be aware of the times of which they are reading, but to blatantly call it racism, seems inappropriate as well.

    Reply
  17. AvatarSarah says

    November 25, 2017 at 9:24 am

    I came to this post exactly as one of the readers you described: an adult revisiting a beloved childhood story …then coming upon “the only good Indian is a dead Indian.” My knee jerk reaction was “okay scratch this of the list to share with my future kids!” But you are completely right: Ingalls’ work is a great platform to discuss racism and xenophobia. Thank you!

    Reply
  18. Avatarjulie bair says

    May 29, 2018 at 5:42 pm

    Thank you for this article! This is the second year I’ve taught Little House on the Prairie in my 5th grade class and it has opened up some very frank and meaningful conversations about prejudice, racism, and historical context. I teach it in the spring. In the fall, I teach The Birchbark House, by Louise Erdrich. As we read Little House, we stop often and reflect on the similarities and differences between the main characters, their families, and their life styles.

    Reply
  19. AvatarAnnie Rosewood says

    June 25, 2018 at 5:07 pm

    I have books from my childhood that I read to my kids. The Little House books are among those. When we get to a spot where things get politically incorrect I just say, “People didn’t know it wasn’t nice to say those things back then.” My kids barely blink. Don’t make it a big thing and it won’t be.

    We have a book on great white sharks from my childhood. It is called “Man-eating Killer Sharks.” My kids love it – even though today we know that sharks do not hunt for humans. Times change. Autres temps, autres mœurs.

    Reply
  20. AvatarDenise Connolly says

    June 26, 2018 at 10:11 pm

    I enjoyed reading your thoughts.
    Why are some people trying to erase history and rewrite to suit their views??? I have the whole collection of Little House on the Prairie books. I have read them so many times! I read them to our son when he was little. We certainly enjoyed the TV show. The stories in the books are told through the eyes of an intelligent, curious, answer seeking young girl who lived a life none of us are now living. Yes, times have changed, and attitudes for the most part have changed, but one should never try to change history and what life was like back then. LEARN from history! These books should be read, shared, discussed now and with future generations.

    Reply
  21. AvatarCarla says

    July 5, 2018 at 4:02 pm

    We cannot and should not rewrite history. Conflicts between peoples were and are real and all readers should be able to read about these issues and, of course, be able to question values and mores of the times, from the author’s perspective. From the author’s “perspective” is the important part. How else would we learn about the conflicts, thoughts, and outcomes of these situations that will occur in all our lives; all of them shaping history? We don’t all think alike, nor do we always agree with others’ views of our world. This is how we develop our viewpoints. This is why it is important to be present when our children are reading things that may not reflect our own values. Open dialogues should be part of book discussions with children, always encouraging them to share their questions and views.

    Reply
  22. AvatarJaiden says

    July 27, 2018 at 7:05 pm

    I find it amazing that so many people equate the “the only good Indian is a dead Indian” thing with Laura being racist. She was not racist. She was simply quoting someone else’s thoughts, which were likely stated more out of fear than anything.

    And yes, while there is more cultural and political sensitivity today, it does us no good to compare the mores of the 19th century to those of the 21st. The difference is far too vast, and in the end, we are all products of our time.

    Reply
  23. AvatarSandra Oneill says

    January 2, 2019 at 9:35 pm

    When I read historical fiction and non-fiction, I am enjoying a journey on a time machine. To read the thoughts, beliefs and experiences of people who once were alive and living their lives every minute of every day is fascinating. It’s not my place to judge or justify them…but rather, to understand them from their perspective, to learn from them and mostly to enjoy the stories.

    Reply
  24. AvatarJan Kuester says

    January 16, 2019 at 1:39 am

    I cannot express how refreshing it is to read the previous comments. I agree with them completely. If we do not know the true history of our nation’s/culture’s past, how can we prevent ourselves from making the same mistakes? Let us use common sense, face our past errors honestly, and not doom ourselves to repeat them Explaining to children that during this time, the settlers did not understand the cultures of the various Native tribes and would say things and make sad choices out of fear is a simple truth every child can appreciate.

    Reply
  25. AvatarKiana says

    January 16, 2019 at 11:25 am

    Loved: “What better way to learn our history than by reading a classic like Little House on the Prairie and using it as a platform for discussion?”

    Reply
    • AvatarLynne Pfeiffer says

      August 10, 2019 at 10:45 am

      Well said.

      Reply
  26. AvatarJennifer says

    January 17, 2019 at 9:42 pm

    I think reading the books with children and taking the opportunity to use some of the racist viewpoints of characters to open up a discussion about race in America is a great thing. Teachers should do this. These things should not be swept under the rug or ignored. While one may assume that we’re all going along in 2019, you never know what children are being exposed to at home, as evidenced by our current rise in racially motivated attacks.

    Reply
  27. AvatarLeah says

    June 10, 2019 at 1:39 pm

    I love those books. My mother read them to me when I was a child. When my two are older I will read them the books at night. Reading them for the first time in years I am once again reminded of the fact that 2019 is vastly different than the 1880s.

    Reply
  28. AvatarBri says

    March 6, 2020 at 7:26 am

    I got here because I was just watching LHOTP and wanted to see the map of walnut grove
    The episode I was watching was about “ their Indian friend” A three generation family in Walnut Grove with a grandson is half Native American
    The grandfather is racist the mother was a missionary who fell in love with a native
    The kids act racist in school
    The Ingles family welcome and embrace the native boy and his mother with open arms
    I didn’t read the actual book related to this topic but I am seriously wondering how much the modern day obsession with calling absolutely everything under the sun “racist“ and it unnecessarily often , has a play in this article of course it’s sad and devastating what happened to the native Americans because of European settlers but it seems to me there’s so much we will never know about
    And , let’s not forget that there was a black woman in Little House on the Prairie as well (again I am referring to the TV show not the books) she was either a schoolteacher or a helper at NELLY’s restaurant I forgot which but she was well respected and loved in the show
    There was another episode with A black man who worked with Charles Ingalls and once again Charles Ingalls came to the defense of the black man when racism came up

    Reply
  29. AvatarRosie Lowe says

    May 18, 2020 at 7:02 pm

    Your comments are very interesting. I began reading the Little House books when I was 9-10 years old. I am now 72. I never really found any thing really racist in the books. Concerning Caroline Ingalls, I think she just feared what she did not know. And of course every treaty the U.S. Government made with Native Americans was never upheld. To this day it makes me sad that Native Americans were forced onto reservations where they were basically starved, cheated and forced to give up their traditions, native tongues. One thing I do love about the books is the way Laura described how her parents worked, to build a small cabin, raise crops, it is amazing that some children find the books boring. I think they are jaded by how very tough pioneer life was. I remember traveling across country in 1953 and having no air conditioner in the car. I cannot imagine traveling across country by wagon!

    Reply
  30. AvatarLydia says

    May 24, 2020 at 11:07 am

    Most fear of someone “different”, or another color, than ourselves, is because people are afraid, of the unknown. If we haven’t met, or heard the good things, about a certain race, or someone from
    Another country, we are sometimes Leary. Frankly, I love to meet people from other countries, learn their ways, and for the most part, taste “their” food. It’s just like people were, and some still are, afraid of those who ride motorcycles. Because, of what they read, and heard about “The Hell’s Angels”. Motorcyclist are ordinary, people. You don’t find any, of them, any worse than someone, who drives a car. Fear, is in the mind, caused by the “unknown”

    Reply
  31. AvatarNatasha says

    July 1, 2020 at 7:31 pm

    What a breath of fresh air in these tumultuous and divisive times. I remember as a girl listening to my parents read these books to us as kids. I remember feeling the fear of the unknown as the natives came into the cabin, the curiosity of the different as Laura rushes in to see them, the sadness she felt when watching them march along and away, and the pride she had when she tanned like “an indian” by ignoring her frustratingly restrictive bonnet. This story held no intention of racism. If anything I felt it embodied the exact opposite. It held the myriad of emotions and feelings that anyone of any age in time feels when we encounter difference in race and culture. It always holds a little fear, a little curiosity, a little empathy, and a little emulation. What happened with Native Americans is just horrible and sad, but I say that with both a European lineage AND a Native American lineage. It is in the past and we must both remember and learn from it…not erase it and then perhaps make the same mistakes again in future generations.

    Reply
    • AvatarJen says

      July 20, 2020 at 3:53 am

      We cannot forget these books were written in a time where this was the norm. We understand now that it was wrong. We can explain this to children as we read the books. To punish Laura Ingalls Wilder for not keeping within the standards of acceptability in 2020 shows lack of perspective and education. To strip her name off an award because she would be considered racist today is unfair. Who knows, in 150 years, maybe 2020 will be considered offensive and unacceptable. This is history folks, good, bad, and ugly. You can’t sanitize or change it.

      Reply
  32. AvatarShawna says

    August 28, 2020 at 1:20 pm

    Very good insight to these books. I grew up reading the books and I still read them since it offers a glimpse into a world that we just can’t experience. When I was a child it did not occur to me that the books were racist since she was repeating what she heard or remembered hearing as a way of preserving the stories. As an adult I cringe when I read the books but I have to remind myself that society has made progress and I’ve grown as a person to recognize racism. It doesn’t stop me from reading the books since I still view them as a perspective made by Laura Ingalls Wilder and she is writing about those times. I applaud you for stating that rather than ban the books it is better to introduce children to historical books and talk about the views of the times and what progress has been made and what we need to do to continue to combat racism in our society. One last observation, I took from Laura’s books that she portrayed or tried to portray first nations with dignity and provided positive examples, such as the Long Winter and how an elder tried to help the townspeople by warning of the impending winter.

    Reply
  33. AvatarAlexis says

    September 29, 2020 at 3:52 pm

    I am part American Indian and I loved them as a kid. Nice refuge from parents who fought all the time.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Connect Facebook Pinterest Twitter YouTube Instagram

Little House on the Prairie Newsletter

Perfect ideas for any Little House fan!

LITTLE HOUSE ON THE PRAIRIE® and associated character names, designs, images and logos are trademarks or registered trademarks owned and licensed by Friendly Family Productions, LLC. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2015-2021 Friendly Family Productions, LLC

Contributors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Licensing | Newsletters